Inaugural Digest
The goal is to create a community united in freely sharing information.
The only prejudice I retain is to select the most interesting material that I believe will help you or spike your interest, and I seem to have done that to your satisfaction to date.
I've been ably assisted by my blogg-partner Dr Donald McDowall in this process. We hope you enjoy the new format. Subscribe to the RSS feed, or remain on my list for notifications of new weekly updates. Contributors are always acknowledged as we appreciate you. So here we go...
Breech
How does that go?
...its a breech turning technique but its not a breech turning technique!
anyhow, good press here for a good procedure
joe
Epidurals
...no, I've not heard Epi's being used for LBP either.
Interestingly medical reporters also like to find items like this that hint at advancements?
Thanks Dr Battistoni for this one.
EPIDURALS: They're useless, researchers discover after 50 years
The epidural is standard medical practice for patients with sciatic back pain. It's an injection of corticosteroids that is given to improve movement and reduce pain.
Although it's a treatment that has been routinely given to patients for the past 50 years, researchers have only now discovered that the procedure is virtually useless.
It has some short-term benefit – which can last for two to six weeks maximum – but the American Academy of Neurology says that it is no longer a recommended treatment.
The change of heart is based on a study of 300 patients with back pain, which found that the steroids offered no long-term benefits. There was no pain relief or improved movement after 24 hours, nor again at three-, six- and 12-month intervals. The only improvement was recorded between two and six weeks, and this was so insignificant that it was no better than that offered by painkillers such as bupivacaine.
Overall, epidural injections didn't help the patient in his day-to-day functioning, his need for surgery, or his long-term pain.
(Source: Journal of American Medical Association, 2007; 297: 1757-8).
Upper Cervical
Another good upper cervical study following on from the Chicago blood pressure atlas adjusting study that was sent out last week (reviewed by Australian Doctor Weekly and others).
Upper cervical has had a great lack of research to date...now that is changing with good, solid, medically co-authored material like this
Resolution of Cervical
Complications
Secondary to Motor Vehicle Accidents
by the Application of Stereotactic Cervical
Alignment (SCALE) Methods:
Statistical Review of 54 Patients
Jack Carleton
Richard Hammond
Joseph O. Obebe
Scott Rosa
Roy Sweat
Matthew Sweat
Marty Moss
ABSTRACT.
Introduction.
Cervical complications
secondary to motor vehicle accidents (MVA) continues
to be an area where patients experience long-term
complications despite having received therapy. Many
of these problems relate to the delicate structures
associated with the cervical
Spine and the precise
alignment needed. We report on the findings of a
Specific cohort of patients from our larger multi
center study that presented specifically with MVA
related complications and how these patients were
successfully treated with what is defined as
Stereotactic Cervical Alignment (SCALE) methods.
Method.
A total of 221 patients were seen in private
chiropractic practice. Inclusion criteria included
existing head, neck, and shoulder pain caused by MVA.
Patients who failed to complete treatment or study
questionnaires were excluded. The equipment and
techniques were consistent with standard SCALE
methods. Patients received an average of 2.76 of
treatment sessions over 11.1 weeks.
Results.
Upon entry, patients had significant debilitating
pain and complications from neck injuries secondary
to MVA. After application of SCALE methods, 84% of
the patients experienced complete or near complete
resolution of their pain and other neck related
complications. All
patients reported significant improvements in their
conditions with 53% of the patients experiencing
complete recovery. Range of motion (ROM) and other
measurements of cervical spine function also
improved. These findings showed durability for the
duration of the measured post-treatment period.
Conclusions.
From these findings, it would appear that SCALE
methods are a useful adjunct for treating specific
types of neck injuries that are secondary to MVA.
Further testing of this technique is currently
underway to further determine its use in treating MVA
and other spinal injuries.
Jack Carleton, MD, is affiliated with Crystal Run
Healthcare, Middletown, NY.
RichardHammond, MD,is affiliated with Magic Valley
Regional Medical Center, Twin Falls, ID.
Joseph O.Obebe, MD,FAC,is affiliated with Legacy
Medical Center, Atlanta, GA and the Oconee Medical
Center, Millegeville, GA.
ScottRosa, DC, BA, BCAO; RoySweat, DC, BA, BCAO
andMatthewSweat, DC, BA, BCAO are all on the Board of
Directors of the R.W. Sweat Foundation, Atlanta, GA.
MartyMoss, PA, BS, is affiliated with MM Medical
Consulting, West Monroe, LA.
Address correspondence to: JackCarleton, MD, P.O. Box
437, Rock Hill , NY 12775
(E-mail: atlas55@hvc.rr.com).
Journal of Whiplash & Related Disorders, Vol.
5(1) 2006 doi:10.1300/J180v05n01_03 15
Available online at
http://www.haworthpress.com/web/JWRD
©2006 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
Head and Neck
This one will stare them
in the face
I recall a patient asking
me if a suboccipital nerve block would help her
mother's neck pain. I'd just finished adjusting her
atlas, and in front of her was big poster
demonstrating the nerve...oh, well
![]()
Chronic Daily Headache Linked to Prior Head or Neck
Injury
Thomas
S. May
Medscape Medical News
2007. © 2007 Medscape
May 9, 2007 — Head and
neck injury (HANI) is a significant risk factor for
the occurrence of chronic daily headaches (CDH), with
a dose-response relationship between the 2
conditions, results of a large, population-based
study indicate.
The research was
conducted by James R. Couch, MD, PhD, a professor of
neurology at the University of Oklahoma Medical
School, in Oklahoma City, and colleagues and was
presented here at the American Academy of Neurology
59th Annual Meeting.
These results suggest
that head injury is a significant risk factor for
chronic daily headache, and the risk is cumulative,
Dr. Couch concluded. "So the effect of a head injury
doesn't really go away," he said. "It's not like in
the movies, where the private investigator gets a
lick on the head, then runs off and catches the bad
guy. In real life, there is continued risk after a
serious head injury."
Frequent
Headaches
"Studies have shown that
50% to 80% of patients with head injury have
headaches immediately after the head injury, and 2
years later, 20% to 30% of these people still have
headaches," Dr. Couch told meeting attendees.
"However, the reverse situation — head injury as a
risk factor for chronic daily headache — has not been
studied in a controlled population," he
said.
To evaluate HANI as a
risk factor for CDH, the researchers analyzed data
from the Frequent Headache Epidemiology Study, which
surveyed 53,000 subjects in the Baltimore and Atlanta
areas by telephone interview.
Subjects who reported
having frequent headaches were asked whether they
ever had an injury to the head or neck and, if so,
whether the injury was followed by fainting or loss
of consciousness. "The fainting or
loss-of-consciousness question was meant to try to
differentiate between those who had a more severe
[injury] and [those who had a] less severe injury,"
Dr. Couch explained.
Subjects experiencing
more than 180 headaches per year were classified as
having CDH, whereas individuals with 2 to 102
headaches per year were classified as episodic
headache controls. "This is the first study to look
at head and neck injury as a risk factor for chronic
daily headache using a control population," Dr. Couch
noted.
Injuries were classified
as potentially precipitating injuries if they
occurred within 2 years of CDH onset (cases) or in an
equivalent randomly generated 2-year period in
controls.
The investigators found
that after adjustment for age, sex, and headache
type, CDH cases were more likely to have experienced
HANI than episodic headache controls, and the odds of
CDH in association with a potentially precipitating
injury were also elevated.
Risk
for Chronic Daily Headaches (CDH) Associated with Any
Head and Neck Injury (HANI) or Potentially
Precipitating Injuries (PPI) vs Episodic Headache
Controls
| Group | Attributable Fraction (%) | Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
| CDH with any HANI | 15
|
1.7 (1.1 – 2.4)
|
| CDH in association with PPI | 5
|
2.3 (1.1 – 4.5)
|
"In this population sample, the estimated proportion of CDH cases theoretically due to HANI was 15% for all HANI and 5% for HANI within 2 years of CDH onset," the authors concluded. "HANI and cumulative HANI are significant contributors to risk for CDH."
The study was supported by GlaxoSmithKline, the Migraine Trust, and the American Headache Society.
American Academy of Neurology 59th Annual Meeting: Session S05.002. Presented May 1, 2007.
For years I have run a casual email
list serving the chiropractic profession, its students
and various interested non-chiropractor supporters.