Inaugural Digest

Welcome to the first Digest format for infoierano mailing list.
The goal is to create a community united in freely sharing information.
The only prejudice I retain is to select the most interesting material that I believe will help you or spike your interest, and I seem to have done that to your satisfaction to date.

I've been ably assisted by my blogg-partner Dr Donald McDowall in this process. We hope you enjoy the new format. Subscribe to the RSS feed, or remain on my list for notifications of new weekly updates. Contributors are always acknowledged as we appreciate you. So here we go...


Breech

How does that go?
...its a breech turning technique but its not a breech turning technique!
anyhow,
good press here for a good procedure
joe

Epidurals

...no, I've not heard Epi's being used for LBP either.
Interestingly medical reporters also like to find items like this that hint at advancements?
Thanks Dr Battistoni for this one.
 
EPIDURALS:  They're useless, researchers discover after 50 years
 
The epidural is standard medical practice for patients with sciatic back pain.  It's an injection of corticosteroids that is given to improve movement and reduce pain.
Although it's a treatment that has been routinely given to patients for the past 50 years, researchers have only now discovered that the procedure is virtually useless.
It has some short-term benefit – which can last for two to six weeks maximum – but the American Academy of Neurology says that it is no longer a recommended treatment.
The change of heart is based on a study of 300 patients with back pain, which found that the steroids offered no long-term benefits.  There was no pain relief or improved movement after 24 hours, nor again at three-, six- and 12-month intervals.  The only improvement was recorded between two and six weeks, and this was so insignificant that it was no better than that offered by painkillers such as bupivacaine.
Overall, epidural injections didn't help the patient in his day-to-day functioning, his need for surgery, or his long-term pain.
(Source:  Journal of American Medical Association, 2007; 297: 1757-8).

Upper Cervical
Another good upper cervical study following on from the Chicago blood pressure atlas adjusting study that was sent out last week (reviewed by Australian Doctor Weekly and others).

Upper cervical has had a great lack of research to date...now that is changing with good, solid, medically co-authored material like this

Resolution of Cervical Complications
Secondary to Motor Vehicle Accidents
by the Application of Stereotactic Cervical
Alignment (SCALE) Methods:
Statistical Review of 54 Patients

Jack Carleton
Richard Hammond
Joseph O. Obebe
Scott Rosa
Roy Sweat
Matthew Sweat
Marty Moss

ABSTRACT.

Introduction.
Cervical complications secondary to motor vehicle accidents (MVA) continues to be an area where patients experience long-term complications despite having received therapy. Many of these problems relate to the delicate structures associated with the cervical
Spine and the precise alignment needed. We report on the findings of a Specific cohort of patients from our larger multi center study that presented specifically with MVA related complications and how these patients were successfully treated with what is defined as Stereotactic Cervical Alignment (SCALE) methods.


Method.
A total of 221 patients were seen in private chiropractic practice. Inclusion criteria included existing head, neck, and shoulder pain caused by MVA. Patients who failed to complete treatment or study questionnaires were excluded. The equipment and techniques were consistent with standard SCALE methods. Patients received an average of 2.76 of treatment sessions over 11.1 weeks.

Results.
Upon entry, patients had significant debilitating pain and complications from neck injuries secondary to MVA. After application of SCALE methods, 84% of the patients experienced complete or near complete resolution of their pain and other neck related complications. All
patients reported significant improvements in their conditions with 53% of the patients experiencing complete recovery. Range of motion (ROM) and other measurements of cervical spine function also improved. These findings showed durability for the duration of the measured post-treatment period.

Conclusions. From these findings, it would appear that SCALE methods are a useful adjunct for treating specific types of neck injuries that are secondary to MVA. Further testing of this technique is currently underway to further determine its use in treating MVA and other spinal injuries.

Jack Carleton, MD, is affiliated with Crystal Run Healthcare, Middletown, NY.

RichardHammond, MD,is affiliated with Magic Valley Regional Medical Center, Twin Falls, ID.
Joseph O.Obebe, MD,FAC,is affiliated with Legacy Medical Center, Atlanta, GA and the Oconee Medical Center, Millegeville, GA.

ScottRosa, DC, BA, BCAO; RoySweat, DC, BA, BCAO andMatthewSweat, DC, BA, BCAO are all on the Board of Directors of the R.W. Sweat Foundation, Atlanta, GA.

MartyMoss, PA, BS, is affiliated with MM Medical Consulting, West Monroe, LA.

Address correspondence to: JackCarleton, MD, P.O. Box 437, Rock Hill , NY 12775

(E-mail:
atlas55@hvc.rr.com).

Journal of Whiplash & Related Disorders, Vol. 5(1) 2006 doi:10.1300/J180v05n01_03 15

Available online at http://www.haworthpress.com/web/JWRD
©2006 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.


Head and Neck
This one will stare them in the face
I recall a patient asking me if a suboccipital nerve block would help her mother's neck pain. I'd just finished adjusting her atlas, and in front of her was big poster demonstrating the nerve...oh, well 
 
unknown
Chronic Daily Headache Linked to Prior Head or Neck Injury

Thomas S. May
Medscape Medical News 2007. © 2007 Medscape
May 9, 2007 — Head and neck injury (HANI) is a significant risk factor for the occurrence of chronic daily headaches (CDH), with a dose-response relationship between the 2 conditions, results of a large, population-based study indicate.
The research was conducted by James R. Couch, MD, PhD, a professor of neurology at the University of Oklahoma Medical School, in Oklahoma City, and colleagues and was presented here at the American Academy of Neurology 59th Annual Meeting.
These results suggest that head injury is a significant risk factor for chronic daily headache, and the risk is cumulative, Dr. Couch concluded. "So the effect of a head injury doesn't really go away," he said. "It's not like in the movies, where the private investigator gets a lick on the head, then runs off and catches the bad guy. In real life, there is continued risk after a serious head injury."
Frequent Headaches
"Studies have shown that 50% to 80% of patients with head injury have headaches immediately after the head injury, and 2 years later, 20% to 30% of these people still have headaches," Dr. Couch told meeting attendees. "However, the reverse situation — head injury as a risk factor for chronic daily headache — has not been studied in a controlled population," he said.
To evaluate HANI as a risk factor for CDH, the researchers analyzed data from the Frequent Headache Epidemiology Study, which surveyed 53,000 subjects in the Baltimore and Atlanta areas by telephone interview.
Subjects who reported having frequent headaches were asked whether they ever had an injury to the head or neck and, if so, whether the injury was followed by fainting or loss of consciousness. "The fainting or loss-of-consciousness question was meant to try to differentiate between those who had a more severe [injury] and [those who had a] less severe injury," Dr. Couch explained.
Subjects experiencing more than 180 headaches per year were classified as having CDH, whereas individuals with 2 to 102 headaches per year were classified as episodic headache controls. "This is the first study to look at head and neck injury as a risk factor for chronic daily headache using a control population," Dr. Couch noted.
Injuries were classified as potentially precipitating injuries if they occurred within 2 years of CDH onset (cases) or in an equivalent randomly generated 2-year period in controls.
The investigators found that after adjustment for age, sex, and headache type, CDH cases were more likely to have experienced HANI than episodic headache controls, and the odds of CDH in association with a potentially precipitating injury were also elevated.
Risk for Chronic Daily Headaches (CDH) Associated with Any Head and Neck Injury (HANI) or Potentially Precipitating Injuries (PPI) vs Episodic Headache Controls






Group Attributable Fraction (%) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
CDH with any HANI 15
1.7 (1.1 – 2.4)
CDH in association with PPI 5
2.3 (1.1 – 4.5)
The researchers also evaluated the cumulative effect of HANI and found that there was a significant linear trend (P < .001) for increasing risk for CDH with increasing numbers of lifetime HANI. People with 3 or more HANIs were at increased risk for CDH (odds ratio, 3.6), compared with those without HANI.
"In this population sample, the estimated proportion of CDH cases theoretically due to HANI was 15% for all HANI and 5% for HANI within 2 years of CDH onset," the authors concluded. "HANI and cumulative HANI are significant contributors to risk for CDH."
The study was supported by GlaxoSmithKline, the Migraine Trust, and the American Headache Society.
American Academy of Neurology 59th Annual Meeting: Session S05.002. Presented May 1, 2007.